@Blazings #33 发现了，Linux 更适合我，再见 M$

坚果 Pro，没什么可抱怨的，没 AD，感觉就是自己的手机，而不是雷布斯的广告投放器。电池够用，神 U 625

@tadtung #3 请问自建导航站是造的轮子还是。。？

一个小坑而已，多踩踩就好了

对外星人来说，地球人活着的意义就是承载不断变异的基因，到时候收割一波。对外星人自己来说，活着的意义还没有找到。。。

@geelaw #2 InActive 窗口颜色随意设，用`[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\DWM]`。

http://www.howtogeek.com/258162/how-to-add-color-to-the-title-bars-of-inactive-program-windows-in-windows-10/

@Newyorkcity #7 不用啊，mysqld 已经跑起来了，并在监听 3306 端口

```
systemctl start mysqld
systemctl enable mysqld
systemctl status mysqld
```

https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-mysql-on-centos-7

CentOS 7 用 systemd 来管服务了，而且 mysqld 也是跑起来的

>I never tell stores who I am. I never let them know. I pay cash and only cash for that reason. I don ’ t care whether it ’ s a local store or Amazon — no one has a right to keep track of what I buy. The local store, I might do business with, I wouldn ’ t give it any way to know my identity. I would pay cash. With Amazon, I can ’ t pay cash, so I don ’ t buy from there.

>And secondary features, conveniences and so on, should not be allowed to justify making the primary goal require collection of data. Let ’ s say you want to ride in a car and pay for the ride. That doesn ’ t fundamentally require knowing who you are. So services which do that must be required by law to give you the option of paying cash, or using some other anonymous-payment system, without being identified. They should also have ways you can call for a ride without identifying yourself, without having to use a cell phone. Companies that won ’ t go along with this — well, they ’ re welcome to go out of business. Good riddance.

>We need a law. Fuck them — there ’ s no reason we should let them exist if the price is knowing everything about us. Let them disappear. They ’ re not important — our human rights are important. No company is so important that its existence justifies setting up a police state. And a police state is what we ’ re heading toward.
>
>Most non-free software has malicious functionalities. And they include spying on people, restricting people — that ’ s called digital restrictions management, back doors, censorship. Empirically, basically, if a program is not free software, it probably has one of these malicious functionalities. So imagine a driverless car, controlled of course by software, and it will probably be proprietary software, meaning not-free software, not controlled by the users but rather by the company that makes the car, or some other company.
>
>Well imagine if that has a back door, which enables somebody to send a command saying, “ Ignore what the passenger said, and go there.” Imagine what that would do. You can be quite sure that China will use that functionality to drive people toward the places they ’ re going to be disappeared or punished. But can you be sure that the U.S. won ’ t?

http://nymag.com/selectall/2018/04/richard-stallman-rms-on-privacy-data-and-free-software.html

挂载点没必要反复创建和删除吧，就一个空目录而已

加一万五换 mbp 顶配

那个 FF 什么的正在输入密码，你等着不要跑

```
> net use * /del
> net use \\192.168.x.xxx\[somesharedfolder] /del
```

@ant2017 #1 想到了 Richard Stallman

@rosu #8 是的啊，各个层面都可以干扰你

咖喱味的渣渣，这部分开源让 Linus 看看吧，（逃

一样的配置，屏幕上出了一连串坏点，跑 Win7 风扇呼呼响，现在装 CentOS 做 DHCP、DNS、NAS、下载机了，还可以跑跑 Scrapy 等等。