xiaohanyu

@wincatcher 加油加油

试验了下，挺不错的，是有打算做成类似于 similarweb 这样的工具平台么？有商业化计划么？

问一下，网站数据是从哪里分析出来的呀？

@realpg 你这人真是搞笑了咧，我哪里自说自话了？你怎么知道我没跟 paddle 的真人联系啊？为了开个户我还得订机票远涉重洋去找他们线下谈？你找他们线下谈他们就能接受么？

我邮件跟他们谈过几轮，贴几段原文：

```
Hi Hanyu,

I completely understand that you have registered your company recently and therefore you do not have the processing statements required.

However as a company, Paddle prioritises the safety and security of our valued customers, and this information is necessary for us to ensure a secure environment for all.

As we are unable to support your business at this time, I would recommend using an alternative payment provider until you are able to provide the requested processing statements.

I assure you that once you are able to resubmit your domain with the necessary information, our team will be more than happy to reassess the situation and provide a prompt response.

I appreciate your understanding.
```

```
Hi Hanyu,

I understand the challenge you're facing. To clarify, you will need to provide processing statements from a payment processor for at least the past three months. These statements help us assess your transaction history and ensure everything aligns with our requirements.

Yes, it typically means that you’ll need to integrate with another payment processor and generate some transaction history before applying for Paddle. Once you’re approved by Paddle, you can then migrate your customer data to our platform.

If you have any more questions or need further assistance during this process, please feel free to reach out.
```

人家已经写了：“Yes, it typically means that you’ll need to integrate with another payment processor and generate some transaction history before applying for Paddle. ”，但是这条规则就没在 paddle 的官网上明示过。

问题是，如果我已经集成了一个 payment processor ，我干嘛还要再费那个劲迁移到 paddle 啊？ MoR 的服务又不只 paddle 一家。

@realpg 不行的，我也是收到同样的真人回复邮件，就是需要 3 个月别家的 processing statements ，然后才能去注册 paddle ，非常坑

@rexue123 注册了

遇到了同样的问题： https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1ea3vol/rejected_by_paddle_with_a_chickenandegg_review/

最后用 stripe 了

@abc1310054026 #72

恰恰相反，我个人认为如果工程师要写出一个“不丑”的页面，最好不用用 tailwind 这种约束性比较弱的方案，还是找成型的更高级一些 UI 库比较好一些。

tailwind 太自由了，也就是比裸写 CSS 高了一小档，个人自由发挥很容易就写出“奔放”过头的页面和设计，当然不可否认，tailwind 确实是有很多优秀的 template 可以参考。

@PluginsWorld #65

对的，是这样的，看上去非常美好，但是如果你要统一尺寸的 unit ，或者 color pallete ，用 tailwind 这种 h-[xxxPx] 的写法，丢失了 TypeScript 中的类型信息，后续修改维护其实还是非常麻烦的。

我个人认为，tailwind 其实是给库的作者使用的，绝大多数人其实也没有用 tailwind 重新写一套组件库的必要。

普通产品开发，用一套成型的组件库，加上 tailwind 适当修饰一下，可能是一个比较好的折衷的办法。